AIMES Library of Examples
Welcome to the AI Meets Education at Stanford (AIMES) Library of Examples
The examples here are all from Stanford faculty, lecturers, and instructors and have been incorporated into actual classes. They include a range of teaching artifacts: course policies, assignments, learning goals, in-class activities, teaching strategies, and more. These examples are meant to spark ideas and showcase a variety of approaches to teaching in a university setting during a time when generative AI exists. As with the AIMES project more broadly, this collection of examples does not represent any institutional position, either in favor or nor against generative AI, and examples illustrate approaches ranging from non-use of AI, to constrained use, to more extensive use. Your disciplinary conventions, learning goals, courses and curricula, ethical and critical considerations will all be important factors in your own instructional choices. Stanford Terms of Use apply. Please address questions and suggestions for additional examples to ctl-stanford@stanford.edu.
How to Use This Resource
Filter the examples below according to your interests and explore individual examples to find out more.
- By selecting among the radio buttons on the left, you can choose which kinds of examples to display on the page.
- Within each filter category, scroll to reveal additional choices.
- You can filter in just one category or in multiple categories.
- When you find an example on the page that you would like to learn more about, click its title to open a page with more details (e.g., pedagogical highlights, instructor insights, course materials).
Filter Categories
- How is AI used in the resource? Filters indicate the instructional stance toward AI in the example
- "AI Use is Assigned" - students are instructed to use AI for specific assignments or activities
- "AI Use is Limited" - instructors constrain AI use to particular tasks or domains
- "AI Use is Prohibited" - no AI use is allowed
- What type of resource? Filters describe the kind of teaching artifact: Assessment, Assignment, Course Description, Course Policy, In-class Activity, Learning Goals
- What disciplinary area? Filters describe these disciplinary groupings: Humanities/Arts, Professional, Science/Engineering, Social Science
General AI Teaching Strategies
For general strategies, read this short overview. It complements the educational approaches to AI in the examples featured here. You can also skip to sections with strategies for particular approaches to AI via the links below.
AI Examples from Stanford Instructors
Find examples of generative AI use, policies, assignments, and more from Stanford courses.
-
Course PolicyIn addition to a clear policy for the course, this example offers a broader disciplinary perspective.
-
-
Short AssignmentStudents learn to both create with and critique AI in this midterm group project.
-
Course PolicyThis studio art course policy encourages nuanced AI decisions and instructor-student collaboration on an AI agreement.
-
Long AssignmentThis project prompts students to analyze AI biases in depth and thoroughly document their process.
-
Department GuidanceA department-wide AI guidance document provides explanations and clear baseline policies in a quantitative field.
-
Course PolicyThis limited-use AI course policy emphasizes learning, disclosure, and reflection.
-
Short AssignmentAI-prohibited problem sets use a novel scoring approach to emphasize learning and preparation for in-person exams.
-
AssessmentIn-person exams serve distinct purposes and address the existence of widely available AI.
-
Short AssignmentThis CS class assignment simulates being a congressional staffer working on AI-related legislation.
-
Long AssignmentA group project assignment prompts students to evaluate AI models using authentic legislative methods.
-
Course PolicyThis course policy addresses technology use in and out of the classroom.
-
Learning GoalsLearning goals in this first-year seminar articulate a range of skills needed to analyze the use of AI in healthcare, including biases and benefits.
-
Course PolicyThis succinct course policy limits AI use in a course that explores the challenges and opportunities AI presents for governments, companies, and society at large
-
Final Project AssignmentThis final project involves research and focuses on places where AI and humans meet.
-
Short AssignmentThree assignments guide students to explore how AI can affect learning, influence the design process, and be engineered with a human in the loop.
-
Learning GoalsLearning goals are framed as questions in a course where the field is changing rapidly.
-
Course PolicyThis brief course policy requires documentation of any use of AI in assignments.
-
In-class ActivityIn a first-day-of-class discussion, students bring up questions about the honor code, including AI use.
-
Final Project AssignmentStudents generate data for a final project by interacting with a chatbot throughout the course.
-
Course PolicyThis course policy allows the usage of AI on assignments but not exams and models disclosure via a template.
-
Short AssignmentAI-focused assignments are used as the class prep material for each day of this course.
-
Learning GoalsCourse learning goals span a wide range of domains, from technical to critical, and address various AI skills.
-
Long AssignmentMultiple assignments build toward prototyping an interactive AI music application.
-
Course PolicyThis brief, cogent note informs students of several reasons for not using LLMs for writing.
-
Course PolicyThis first-year writing course policy helps students parse permitted and unpermitted uses of AI.
-
Course PolicyDetailed course policies guide students through ongoing AI-powered analysis.
-
Short AssignmentStudents use AI in multiple types of short, weekly assignments in specific ways
-
Final Project AssignmentStudents intentionally use and reflect on AI in a final presentation and policy memo.
-
Course PolicyProvides the rationale for restrictions of AI in coursework.