Folks:

I received a great deal of feedback on posting #663 THE PERILS OF POWERPOINT ®. Here is one of the responses with a somewhat different perspective. It is by by William R. Hamilton and Melissa F. Beery of Creighton University Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska. Reprinted with permission.

Regards,

Rick Reis reis@stanford.edu

UP NEXT: Excellence: An Immodest Proposal

Tomorrow's Teaching and Learning

------------------------------------------ 741 words ---------------------------------------

A PRUDENT PERSPECTIVE ON "THE PERILS OF POWERPOINT®

William R. Hamilton and Melissa F. Beery

PowerPoint® presentations are becoming the standard method to aid in lectures and college discussions. PowerPoint® is also frequently seen in financial, educational, and other professional institutions. The authors William R. Hamilton and Melissa F. Beery would like to respond to the concerns presented in "The Perils of PowerPoint®" by Thomas R. McDaniel, and Kathryn M McDaniel. PowerPoint® presentations are reviewed in terms of the format, technology, and style.

1. "It's Inflexible."

PowerPoint® presentations are inherently flexible because each presenter is different and can adjust the PowerPoint® slides accordingly. For example, if a question is built into the slide, then the presenter can pause for a group discussionŠ.When a person's lecture is flexible and accommodating, then the PowerPoint® presentation is a reflection of the author. In fact, PowerPoint® is only intended to be a framework for presentation of information and content of the lecture. Teachable moments can be created within that framework. The presenter need not be a slave to PowerPoint®, in that PowerPoint® presentations are as flexible as the author wants them to be.

2. "It's Risky."

Risk can be countered with options available outside of the technology. PowerPoint® presenters have a plethora of backup plans available if they chose to use them. A whole system failure is not common but slides can be printed in advance and used in the event the technology doesn't work at all. File management can be an issue but a CD, flash card, or the presenter can email the presentation to himself can all be options. Presenters need to be aware that a backup method is the key to any technological or other types of "failures," and then adjustments can be made. For example, a presenter that relies on a prepared report in his briefcase but leaves that briefcase on the subway would be in the same position as the PowerPoint® presenter that is faced with a computer crash. Do the presentations continue in either case? That's up to the individual person, not the briefcase or PowerPoint®. Backup plans are available almost without limit.

3. "It's a Crutch."

In high school speech, some students will use note cards and try to hide their face behind a 3 X 5 card. Some of these students will outgrow their introverted tendencies, while others will not. The same goes for those who use PowerPoint® presentations. Regardless of the tool used, introverted tendencies will occur because of the individual. There are rare instances when a PowerPoint® presenter will try and use their technology as a barrier. However, barriers can be overcome by involving the audience. Some of the best presentations involve PowerPoint® presentations that are paused to allow group work and enhance discussion if the presenter wishes it to do so.

4. "It's Boring"

It is generally agreed that the more a student is "engaged," or the more senses are utilized when involved in a discussion, the more the student will retain the information. PowerPoint® enables students to "see" in addition to hear a presentation. A student who wants or needs to "Zone-Out" probably can make that happen even if they were electrocuted by the PowerPoint® presentation as they begin to drift off. Simple entertainment techniques can be added to break up the monotony of a lecture. To blame the technology for "The Zone" is like blaming paper for a poor lecture.

5. "It's Style without Substance."

If presenters wish to be successful to any degree, they must learn how to have a bit of style to enhance their presentation. Even a novice can manipulate PowerPoint® to his or her liking with minimal training and experience. On the other hand, PowerPoint® presentations can be tailored to fit even complex discussions. >From graduate students to senior professors, many have used the PowerPoint® format to defend dissertations and present research. Styles will vary depending on the use of PowerPoint®, but the substance is in the content of the lecture.

Like many technological aids for the classroom, PowerPoint® presentations have their advantages and disadvantages. However, PowerPoint® is the correct tool to most likely to be used. It would be difficult to go back to using the chalk board where poor handwriting and broken chalk are almost always an issue. With PowerPoint®, the professor also doesn't have to spend his time with his back to the students writing everything on the board. Instead, he or she can engage the students when a group discussion question flies in and sparks the intellectual thought process.