Folks:
The posting below expresses some further ideas about online learning
in response to Msg. #601 THE DOs AND DON'Ts OF ONLINE LEARNING.
It is by Professor Amram Eshel, Department of Plant Sciences,
Tel-Aviv University, who can be reached at: <AmramE@tauex.tau.ac.il>.
Regards,
Rick Reis
reis@stanford.edu
UP NEXT: Planning a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System
Tomorrow's Teaching and Learning
----------------------------------- 1,308 words --------------------------------
FURTHER IDEAS ABOUT "DOs AND DON'Ts OF ONLING LEARNING"
A recent posting in TOMORROW'S PROFESSOR(SM) MAILING LIST entitled
"THE DOs AND DON'Ts OF ONLINE LEARNING" presented a
rather grim view of the experience of instructors who are involved
in this mode of teaching. This is a discouraging situation when
we think that we make a great progress investing large amounts
of money and human resources in making the on-line platforms available
and end up with disappointed and frustrated instructors. These
feelings are probably reciprocated by similar ones at the students'
side.
Reading the entries in this posting made me realize that many
of the complaints raised with respect to the way the students
behave in on-line environment are not unique to this mode of learning,
but are relevant to learning situations in general. However, it
does not have to be that way. In the following text I intend to
clarify that some of these negative feelings are based on misconceptions
that lead to unrealistic expectations by the instructors. Later
I will suggest techniques that can help in guiding students towards
the desired conduct, emphasizing those that are especially effective
for on-line teaching.
The first misconception stems probably from the opening question
that was posed to the instructors who took part in the study "How
should students go about establishing a good instructor/student
relationship with you?" The implicit notion that the students
are responsible for the instructor/student rapport is erroneous.
The responsibility for establishing and maintaining civilized
atmosphere and proper behavior in the classroom or in the on-line
teaching environment is totally with the instructor. This is not
always an easy task and is influenced by numerous factors which
are outside our control, from student age to the time-of-day that
the class takes place and many others in between. Nevertheless,
the instructor is the one who sets the rules for the activities
in the teaching environment and should use disciplinary, or better
other means which I will describe later, in order to make sure
that those rules are upheld.
The second misconception is exemplified in the following answer
by one of the instructors "Students obviously glean instructors'
favor by being dedicated, hard working, and willing to go the
extra mile to learn." This is an unrealistic expectation.
Nature favors those forms which make the most gain for the least
effort. In biology they are called "the fittest" in
engineering "the most efficient" and in economics "the
most profitable". Going a truly "extra mile", meaning
without gaining anything for it, goes against the grain of human
behavior. The good news is that students as other humans view
non-materialistic entities such as recognition, praise and a good
grade as a gain worthwhile making an effort for. Instructors should
use that as means to achieve the ends they want. I will explain
later how that can be done.
I am now getting to the Dos. What are the actions the instructor,
and especially the on-line one, can take in order to have students
act the way it will be acceptable and meet all the expectations.
The most important thing is stating clearly and in full your expectations
from the students. Do not be annoyed by "those who assume
I should be online 24/7 to answer their questions". Simply
state: "Questions will only be answered once a day, in the
afternoon except on weekends" or whatever you see appropriate.
This way they will know what to expect and act upon it. Anyone
who does not comply will not get it his way. It is very important
to lay down those ground rules clearly at the start. Do not give
the students the feeling that you invent them as you go along.
These rules should be put in writing and made available to all
students. Here is an advantage for using a course website, no
one can say they misplaced that page or wasn't there when it was
handed out. Make sure it is mar!
ked clearly and easy to find in your website and refer to it in
your answers and instructions.
Another effective communication tool, that is used in numerous
websites in order to lower the burden of repeating answers, is
having a "FAQ's" section in your website. This is especially
important if there are many technical details the students should
be familiar with in order to perform their assignments. When you
get questions related to an item you took the trouble to explain
among the FAQ's simply answer by "See FAQ #X". They
will soon come to recognize it as a valuable resource to check
instead of writing and waiting for this simple answer.
Remember that the responsibility for establishing and maintaining
a courteous atmosphere in the teaching environment lies totally
with you. If you act that way, in most cases students would respond
in a similar fashion. Address your students respectfully and try
to start every communication with a positive note, even if your
main message is criticizing e.g., "I appreciate the effort
you made, however ..." There will always be those who require
a disciplinary action, but in order for it to be effective they
should be informed what are they disciplined for, and the ground
rules I mentioned earlier will be of great assistance here.
I suggest you set aside a certain fraction of the final grade
for management purposes. Much the same way that my elementary
school teacher used to give 5 points for tidiness and 5 points
for clear handwriting out of the grade of every paper we handed
in. If you want the students to make an effort, make it worthwhile
to them by giving extra points. For example, if you want them
to search the literature for certain information, announce that
the first one who will post the correct reference will gain some
points towards the final grade. Give them points for participation,
if this is important, but remember that stalkers may learn as
much as those who are active. This may work both ways. A good
technique that reduces tardiness is announcing that a certain
amount of points will be deducted from late submissions for every
day that passes since the deadline. By giving points for meeting
your demands and deducting points for failing to do so you establish
an atmosphere of student a!
ccountability that should be of general educational value.
Finally, plagiarism can be dealt with rather effectively in
on-line courses. I do that by announcing that after all papers
will be submitted electronically they will be posted in the course
website under their names for everybody to see. I do not see any
problem with that. Student papers are not privileged information
as long as you do not openly publish the grade each one was given.
This will eliminate copying form one another and obvious cut-and-paste
from common resources. In my experience it will also make the
students regard their assignments more seriously. They usually
regard peer opinion higher than that of the instructor, and would
not want to be caught by their friends doing a sloppy or a dishonest
job. Another use of this is when you think they can learn by reading
each other's works e.g., seeing other points of view or different
styles. I use a polling tool available in our on-line teaching
platform to get the students elect the best paper. This make them
read t!
he papers you posted, provided there are not too many students
in the group. The winner is recognized and may also get an extra
point.
In summary, it is the instructor who is responsible for the student
behavior in the teaching environment. By encouraging desired behavior
and discouraging undesired one the instructor should maintain
good and productive atmosphere. A precondition for it is setting
clear ground rules at the start and making them known to everybody.
Giving appropriate rewards will persuade the students to make
the efforts you expect them to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOMORROW'S PROFESSOR MAILING LIST
is a shared mission partnership with the
American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) http://www.aahe.org/
The National Teaching and Learning Forum (NT&LF) http://www.ntlf.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------