"Herewith, a glossary of educational assessment terms, within
the college context and focusing on student learning."
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#448 BEYOND CONFUSION: AN ASSESSMENT
GLOSSARY
Folks:
The posting below provides a nice glossary of some of the key terms
used in higher education assessment. It is by by Andrea Leskes,
vice president for education and quality initiatives, AAC&U
Peer Review, Winter/Spring 2002, Volume 4, Number 2/3. Peer Review
is a publication of the Association of American Colleges and Universities
http://www.aacu.org/index.cfm.
Copyright © 2002, all rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.
Rick Reis
reis@stanford.edu
UP NEXT: Strategies That Improve Undergraduate Education
Tomorrow's Teaching and Learning
---------------------- 1,293 words ----------------------
BEYOND CONFUSION: AN ASSESSMENT GLOSSARY
By Andrea Leskes, vice president for education and quality initiatives,
AAC&U
The articles and commentaries in this edition of Peer Review raise
important issues for all college educators. Part of our professional
responsibilities involves knowing if, what, and how well students
learn what is being taught. Ideally, assessment would be a regular,
inherent, and transparent part of all teaching and learning.
College professors regularly employ with comfort some types of
assessment; they rightly point this out when challenged, explaining
how they always evaluate student learning, using tests or homework
assignments to do so. Assessment of this sort normally occurs within
the confines of individual courses and can provide important information
to both the student and the professor. However, higher education
has less of a history of examining accomplishments that build cumulatively,
over time, throughout a student's entire undergraduate career. Yet
we acknowledge that many of the goals of college education are exactly
these accomplishments (e.g., effective communication, ethical judgement,
analytical acuity). These, too, are the complex accomplishments
that the previous articles address.
Higher education lacks a common vocabulary about assessment; and
individuals use terms in mutating ways to refer to varying levels
of analysis. Some interpretations imply external oversight or control,
an unpleasant idea for most college faculty. Miscommunication and
mistrust result from this confused language and are likely to interfere
with developing the kind of useful value added assessment proposed
by Benjamin, Hersh, and Klein.
To shine a light, as Marc Chun so eloquently puts it, in the darkness
and "where we should be looking," this "reality check"
attempts to provide such a common vocabulary for the concepts used
or implied in the preceding articles. Herewith, a glossary of educational
assessment terms, within the college context and focusing on student
learning.
Value Added
The increase in learning that occurs during a course, program,
or undergraduate education. Can either focus on the individual student
(how much better a student can write, for example, at the end than
at the beginning) or on a cohort of students (whether senior papers
demonstrate more sophisticated writing skills-in the aggregate-than
freshmen papers). Requires a baseline measurement for comparison.
Standards
Sets a level of accomplishment all students are expected to meet
or exceed. Standards do not necessarily imply high quality learning;
sometimes the level is a lowest common denominator. Nor do they
imply complete standardization in a program; a common minimum level
could be achieved by multiple pathways and demonstrated in various
ways. Examples: carrying on a conversation about daily activities
in a foreign language using correct grammar and comprehensible pronunciation;
achieving a certain score on a standardized test.
Formative Assessment
The gathering of information about student learning-during the
progression of a course or program and usually repeatedly-to improve
the learning of those students. Example: reading the first lab reports
of a class to assess whether some or all students in the group need
a lesson on how to make them succinct and informative.
Summative Assessment
The gathering of information at the conclusion of a course, program,
or undergraduate career to improve learning or to meet accountability
demands. When used for improvement, impacts the next cohort of students
taking the course or program. Examples: examining student final
exams in a course to see if certain specific areas of the curriculum
were understood less well than others; analyzing senior projects
for the ability to integrate across disciplines.
Assessment for Accountability:
Assessment of some unit (could be a department, program or entire
institution) to satisfy stakeholders external to the unit itself.
Results are often compared across units. Always summative. Example:
to retain state approval, the achievement of a 90 percent pass rate
or better on teacher certification tests by graduates of a school
of education.
Assessment for Improvement:
Assessment that feeds directly, and often immediately, back into
revising the course, program or institution to improve student learning
results. Can be formative or summative (see "formative assessment"
for an example).
Qualitative Assessment
Collects data that does not lend itself to quantitative methods
but rather to interpretive criteria (see the first example under
"standards").
Quantitative Assessment
Collects data that can be analyzed using quantitative methods (see
"assessment for accountability" for an example).
Direct Assessment of Learning:
Gathers evidence, based on student performance, which demonstrates
the learning itself. Can be value added, related to standards, qualitative
or quantitative, embedded or not, using local or external criteria.
Examples: most classroom testing for grades is direct assessment
(in this instance within the confines of a course), as is the evaluation
of a research paper in terms of the discriminating use of sources.
The latter example could assess learning accomplished within a single
course or, if part of a senior requirement, could also assess cumulative
learning.
Indirect Assessment of Learning
Gathers reflection about the learning or secondary evidence of
its existence. Example: a student survey about whether a course
or program helped develop a greater sensitivity to issues of diversity.
Assessment of Individuals
Uses the individual student, and his/her learning, as the level
of analysis. Can be quantitative or qualitative, formative or summative,
standards-based or value added, and used for improvement. Would
need to be aggregated if used for accountability purposes. Examples:
improvement in student knowledge of a subject during a single course;
improved ability of a student to build cogent arguments over the
course of an undergraduate career.
Assessment of Programs
Uses the department or program as the level of analysis. Can be
quantitative or qualitative, formative or summative, standards-based
or value added, and used for improvement or for accountability.
Ideally program goals and objectives would serve as a basis for
the assessment. Example: how sophisticated a close reading of texts
senior English majors can accomplish (if used to determine value
added, would be compared to the ability of newly declared majors).
Assessment of Institutions
Uses the institution as the level of analysis. Can be quantitative
or qualitative, formative or summative, standards-based or value
added, and used for improvement or for accountability. Ideally institution-wide
goals and objectives would serve as a basis for the assessment.
Example: how well students across the institution can work in multi-cultural
teams as sophomores and seniors.
Embedded Assessment
A means of gathering information about student learning that is
built into and a natural part of the teaching-learning process.
Often uses for assessment purposes classroom assignments that are
evaluated to assign students a grade. Can assess individual student
performance or aggregate the information to provide information
about the course or program; can be formative or summative, quantitative
or qualitative. Example: as part of a course, expecting each senior
to complete a research paper that is graded for content and style,
but is also assessed for advanced ability to locate and evaluate
Web-based information (as part of a college-wide outcome to demonstrate
information literacy).
Local Assessment
Means and methods that are developed by an institution's faculty
based on their teaching approaches, students, and learning goals.
Can fall into any of the definitions here except "external
assessment," for which is it an antonym. Example: one college's
use of nursing students' writing about the "universal precautions"
at multiple points in their undergraduate program as an assessment
of the development of writing competence.
External Assessment
Use of criteria (rubric) or an instrument developed by an individual
or organization external to the one being assessed. Usually summative,
quantitative, and often high-stakes (see below). Example: GRE exams.
"High stakes" Use of Assessment
The decision to use the results of assessment to set a hurdle that
needs to be cleared for completing a program of study, receiving
certification, or moving to the next level. Most often the assessment
so used is externally developed, based on set standards, carried
out in a secure testing situation, and administered at a single
point in time. Examples: at the secondary school level, statewide
exams required for graduation; in postgraduate education, the bar
exam.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information, contact
David Tritelli,
Editor,
at tritelli@aacu.org.
Peer Review provides a quarterly briefing on emerging trends and
key debates in undergraduate education. Each issue is focused on
a specific topic, provides comprehensive analysis, and features
campus perspectives.
Publication of the Association of American Colleges and Universities
http://www.aacu.org/index.cfm
Peer Review is read by more than 5,000 college administrators,
faculty, graduate students, and other educators each quarter. Join
the growing audience of individuals who rely on Peer Review to enrich
their campus resources focusing on undergraduate education. Subscribe
to Peer Review today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOMORROW'S PROFESSOR MAILING LIST
is a shared mission partnership with the
American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) http://www.aahe.org/
The National Teaching and Learning Forum (NT&LF) http://www.ntlf.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|